Erratum to "The geometry of hemi-slant submanifolds of a locally product Riemannian manifold"

Hakan Mete Taştan*, Fatma Özdemir

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

We realized that in our paper [1] the proof of Theorem 4.8 has two mistakes. Here, we explicitly give some details: Since the tensor field Ω of type (0; 2) defined by Ω(Ū, Ve ) = g(FŪ, V ) is not skew-symmetric, its differential cannot be taken in the usual sense. Moreover, after re-calculation of the equality [inline-equation] (0.1) we see that equation (0.1) does not hold. Therefore, the proof of Theorem 4.8 of [1] is not valid. Then Corollary 4.9 is also not valid. Moreover, equation (4.22) in Corollary 4.9 affects the validity of Theorem 7.1. However, with an additional hypothesis, i.e. "integrability of the anti-invariant distribution [inline-eqaution]⊥" in Corollary 4.9 and Theorem 7.1, these results continue to be true.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1401
Number of pages1
JournalTurkish Journal of Mathematics
Volume40
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Tübi˙tak.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Erratum to "The geometry of hemi-slant submanifolds of a locally product Riemannian manifold"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this