Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-Specific US breast cancer mortality

  • Diego Munoz
  • , Aimee M. Near
  • , Nicolien T. Van Ravesteyn
  • , Sandra J. Lee
  • , Clyde B. Schechter
  • , Oguzhan Alagoz
  • , Donald A. Berry
  • , Elizabeth S. Burnside
  • , Yaojen Chang
  • , Gary Chisholm
  • , Harry J. De Koning
  • , Mehmet Ali Ergun
  • , Eveline A.M. Heijnsdijk
  • , Hui Huang
  • , Natasha K. Stout
  • , Brian L. Sprague
  • , Amy Trentham-Dietz
  • , Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
  • , Sylvia K. Plevritis*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Stanford University
  • Georgetown University
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Harvard University
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • University of Wisconsin
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • University of Vermont

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

139 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Molecular characterization of breast cancer allows subtype-directed interventions. Estrogen receptor (ER) is the longest-established molecular marker. Methods We used six established population models with ER-specific input parameters on age-specific incidence, disease natural history, mammography characteristics, and treatment effects to quantify the impact of screening and adjuvant therapy on age-adjusted US breast cancer mortality by ER status from 1975 to 2000. Outcomes included stage-shifts and absolute and relative reductions in mortality; sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of varying screening frequency or accuracy. Results In the year 2000, actual screening and adjuvant treatment reduced breast cancer mortality by a median of 17 per 100 000 women (model range = 13-21) and 5 per 100 000 women (model range = 3-6) for ER-positive and ER-negative cases, respectively, relative to no screening and no adjuvant treatment. For ER-positive cases, adjuvant treatment made a higher relative contribution to breast cancer mortality reduction than screening, whereas for ER-negative cases the relative contributions were similar for screening and adjuvant treatment. ER-negative cases were less likely to be screendetected than ER-positive cases (35.1% vs 51.2%), but when screen-detected yielded a greater survival gain (five-year breast cancer survival = 35.6% vs 30.7%). Screening biennially would have captured a lower proportion of mortality reduction than annual screening for ER-negative vs ER-positive cases (model range = 80.2%-87.8% vs 85.7%-96.5%). Conclusion As advances in risk assessment facilitate identification of women with increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer, additional mortality reductions could be realized through more frequent targeted screening, provided these benefits are balanced against screening harms.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberdju289
JournalJournal of the National Cancer Institute
Volume106
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2014.

Funding

This research was supported by grant number U01 CA152958 from the National Cancer Institute as part of the Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network. Data were provided by the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (HHSN261 201100031C).

FundersFunder number
National Cancer InstituteU01CA152958

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-Specific US breast cancer mortality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this