TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of screening and systemic adjuvant therapy on ER-Specific US breast cancer mortality
AU - Munoz, Diego
AU - Near, Aimee M.
AU - Van Ravesteyn, Nicolien T.
AU - Lee, Sandra J.
AU - Schechter, Clyde B.
AU - Alagoz, Oguzhan
AU - Berry, Donald A.
AU - Burnside, Elizabeth S.
AU - Chang, Yaojen
AU - Chisholm, Gary
AU - De Koning, Harry J.
AU - Ergun, Mehmet Ali
AU - Heijnsdijk, Eveline A.M.
AU - Huang, Hui
AU - Stout, Natasha K.
AU - Sprague, Brian L.
AU - Trentham-Dietz, Amy
AU - Mandelblatt, Jeanne S.
AU - Plevritis, Sylvia K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author 2014.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Background Molecular characterization of breast cancer allows subtype-directed interventions. Estrogen receptor (ER) is the longest-established molecular marker. Methods We used six established population models with ER-specific input parameters on age-specific incidence, disease natural history, mammography characteristics, and treatment effects to quantify the impact of screening and adjuvant therapy on age-adjusted US breast cancer mortality by ER status from 1975 to 2000. Outcomes included stage-shifts and absolute and relative reductions in mortality; sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of varying screening frequency or accuracy. Results In the year 2000, actual screening and adjuvant treatment reduced breast cancer mortality by a median of 17 per 100 000 women (model range = 13-21) and 5 per 100 000 women (model range = 3-6) for ER-positive and ER-negative cases, respectively, relative to no screening and no adjuvant treatment. For ER-positive cases, adjuvant treatment made a higher relative contribution to breast cancer mortality reduction than screening, whereas for ER-negative cases the relative contributions were similar for screening and adjuvant treatment. ER-negative cases were less likely to be screendetected than ER-positive cases (35.1% vs 51.2%), but when screen-detected yielded a greater survival gain (five-year breast cancer survival = 35.6% vs 30.7%). Screening biennially would have captured a lower proportion of mortality reduction than annual screening for ER-negative vs ER-positive cases (model range = 80.2%-87.8% vs 85.7%-96.5%). Conclusion As advances in risk assessment facilitate identification of women with increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer, additional mortality reductions could be realized through more frequent targeted screening, provided these benefits are balanced against screening harms.
AB - Background Molecular characterization of breast cancer allows subtype-directed interventions. Estrogen receptor (ER) is the longest-established molecular marker. Methods We used six established population models with ER-specific input parameters on age-specific incidence, disease natural history, mammography characteristics, and treatment effects to quantify the impact of screening and adjuvant therapy on age-adjusted US breast cancer mortality by ER status from 1975 to 2000. Outcomes included stage-shifts and absolute and relative reductions in mortality; sensitivity analyses evaluated the impact of varying screening frequency or accuracy. Results In the year 2000, actual screening and adjuvant treatment reduced breast cancer mortality by a median of 17 per 100 000 women (model range = 13-21) and 5 per 100 000 women (model range = 3-6) for ER-positive and ER-negative cases, respectively, relative to no screening and no adjuvant treatment. For ER-positive cases, adjuvant treatment made a higher relative contribution to breast cancer mortality reduction than screening, whereas for ER-negative cases the relative contributions were similar for screening and adjuvant treatment. ER-negative cases were less likely to be screendetected than ER-positive cases (35.1% vs 51.2%), but when screen-detected yielded a greater survival gain (five-year breast cancer survival = 35.6% vs 30.7%). Screening biennially would have captured a lower proportion of mortality reduction than annual screening for ER-negative vs ER-positive cases (model range = 80.2%-87.8% vs 85.7%-96.5%). Conclusion As advances in risk assessment facilitate identification of women with increased risk of ER-negative breast cancer, additional mortality reductions could be realized through more frequent targeted screening, provided these benefits are balanced against screening harms.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84985004003&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/jnci/dju289
DO - 10.1093/jnci/dju289
M3 - Article
C2 - 25255803
AN - SCOPUS:84985004003
SN - 0027-8874
VL - 106
JO - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
JF - Journal of the National Cancer Institute
IS - 11
M1 - dju289
ER -