Effect of stabilization on biomass activity

Emine Ubay Cokgor*, Didem Okutman Tas, Gulsum Emel Zengin, Guclu Insel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study aimed to compare aerobic and aerobic/anoxic stabilization processes in terms of organic matter and the biomass removal efficiencies using a municipal sludge sample. The efficiency of stabilization process was assessed monitoring suspended solids (SS), volatile suspended solids (VSS), total and dissolved organic carbon (TOC, DOC), nitrate, nitrite, and phosphate parameters. The oxygen uptake rate (OUR) measurements were conducted to determine active biomass concentration. On the 30th day of the aerobic stabilization, the SS, VSS and TOC removal efficiencies were 22%, 28% and 55%, respectively. Under aerobic/anoxic conditions, removal efficiencies for SS, VSS and TOC were 25%, 27% and 67%. On the 17th day of the stabilization, SS and VSS removal rates were 60. mg. SS/L. day and 47. mg. VSS/L. day for aerobic and 102. mg. SS/L. day and 63. mg. VSS/L day for aerobic/anoxic conditions, respectively. These findings reflected the higher stabilization performance of the aerobic/anoxic conditions. Based on respirometric results, the ratios of the active biomass were decreased to 30% and 24% for the 17th and 30th day of the aerobic stabilization, respectively. Such results have significant implications relative to the activity decrease quantification of the biomass as well as its further application potentials after aerobic or aerobic/anoxic sludge stabilization.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)547-553
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Biotechnology
Volume157
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2012

Keywords

  • Aerobic stabilization
  • Alternating aerobic-anoxic stabilization
  • Modelling
  • Municipal sludge
  • Respirometry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of stabilization on biomass activity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this