TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic Rupture Process of the 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake (SE Türkiye)
T2 - Variable Rupture Speed and Implications for Seismic Hazard
AU - Wang, Zijia
AU - Zhang, Wenqiang
AU - Taymaz, Tuncay
AU - He, Zhongqiu
AU - Xu, Tianhong
AU - Zhang, Zhenguo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023. The Authors.
PY - 2023/8/16
Y1 - 2023/8/16
N2 - We considered various non-uniformities such as branch faults, rotation of stress field directions, and changes in tectonic environments to simulate the dynamic rupture process of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake in SE Türkiye. We utilized near-fault waveform data, GNSS static displacements, and surface rupture to constrain the dynamic model. The results indicate that the high initial stress accumulated in the Kahramanmaraş-Çelikhan seismic gap leads to the successful triggering of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) and the supershear rupture in the northeast segment. Due to the complexity of fault geometry, the rupture speed along the southeastern segment of the EAF varied repeatedly between supershear and subshear, which contributed to the unexpectedly strong ground motion. Furthermore, the triggering of the EAF reminds us to be aware of the risk of seismic gaps on major faults being triggered by secondary faults, which is crucial to prevent significant disasters.
AB - We considered various non-uniformities such as branch faults, rotation of stress field directions, and changes in tectonic environments to simulate the dynamic rupture process of the 6 February 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake in SE Türkiye. We utilized near-fault waveform data, GNSS static displacements, and surface rupture to constrain the dynamic model. The results indicate that the high initial stress accumulated in the Kahramanmaraş-Çelikhan seismic gap leads to the successful triggering of the East Anatolian Fault (EAF) and the supershear rupture in the northeast segment. Due to the complexity of fault geometry, the rupture speed along the southeastern segment of the EAF varied repeatedly between supershear and subshear, which contributed to the unexpectedly strong ground motion. Furthermore, the triggering of the EAF reminds us to be aware of the risk of seismic gaps on major faults being triggered by secondary faults, which is crucial to prevent significant disasters.
KW - 2023 Mw 7.8 Kahramanmaraş earthquake
KW - earthquake rupture dynamics
KW - transient supershear rupture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85166738091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2023GL104787
DO - 10.1029/2023GL104787
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85166738091
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 50
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 15
M1 - e2023GL104787
ER -