Abstract
This study presents a user-centred framework to evaluate public space resilience, operationalized through the notion of ‘Lost and Dead Spaces’. It also introduces a transferable design framework that links user-perceived resilience criteria to concrete tactics for civic squares. A dual-assessment survey with 140 users in Istanbul’s Taksim Square tests 18 spatial criteria and finds a gap between idealized expectations and lived experience (p < 0.05 for 15 criteria). Notably, findings show a paradox: users prioritize functional attributes, yet overall satisfaction is driven by affective dimensions such as a sense of place (ρ = 0.32), advocating a holistic, perception-based approach.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 555-573 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Urban Design |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Taksim Square
- Urban resilience
- lost and dead spaces
- multi-criteria assessment
- public space
- user perception
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Designing resilient civic squares: a user-centered multi-criteria framework with evidence from Taksim'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver