Degradation of thiocyanate by electrochemical oxidation process in coke oven wastewater: Role of operative parameters and mechanistic study

Ayşenur Turan, Ramazan Keyikoglu, Mehmet Kobya, Alireza Khataee*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents the removal of thiocyanate (SCN) from coke oven wastewater by the electrooxidation (EO) process. Initially, the performances boron-doped diamond (BDD) and different DSA (Dimensionally stable anode) electrodes including Ti/IrO2, Ti/IrO2−RuO2, and Ti/IrO2−RuO2−TiO2 in SCN removal were compared. BDD anode outperformed the Ti−based mixed metal oxide (MMO) anodes achieving 96.51% SCN removal efficiency. The most favorable conditions for the removal of SCN using BDD anode were determined as follows: pH = 9, current density = 43.10 A m−2, and the electrolyte concentration (Na2SO4) = 2.5 g L−1. The strong role of OH in the removal of SCN was confirmed by the addition of radical quenching agents. The evolution of the intermediates as a result of the EO of SCN was determined. Under the determined conditions, the EO process could remove 84.13% of SCN and 94.67% of phenol from a real coke oven wastewater, which was comparable to that of the simulated solution. The electrical energy consumption cost of the process to remove 1 kg of SCN was calculated as 0.208 US $. Overall, the study showed the EO using BDD anode is a cost-effective method for the removal of SCN from a coke oven wastewater.

Original languageEnglish
Article number127014
JournalChemosphere
Volume255
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • Boron-doped diamond
  • Coke oven wastewater
  • Electrochemical oxidation
  • Operation cost
  • Thiocyanate removal

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Degradation of thiocyanate by electrochemical oxidation process in coke oven wastewater: Role of operative parameters and mechanistic study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this