Abstract
Non-ductile reinforced concrete frames with unconfined joints dominate the collapse hazard of the existing building stock. Their CFRP-retrofit margin at collapse demand is poorly quantified. Two one-third-scale portal sub-frames were tested under Froude similitude. Specimen 1 was bare. Specimen 2 carried a three-ply hoop CFRP jacket on columns, beams, and joints. Both received the Antakya 3141 record from the 2023 Kahramanmaraş (Formula presented.) 7.7 mainshock at design intensity 0.35 g and collapse intensity 1.0 g. Cyclic response was decomposed into flexural, shear, and slip energy. At design intensity, the retrofit cut peak roof drift by 54%, suppressed residual offset, and lowered the calibrated Park–Ang index from 0.89 to 0.32. Slip share dropped from 47% to 5%. At collapse intensity, the retrofitted frame transitioned to joint-panel debonding-controlled failure at 8% drift with 245 mm residual, and shear share rose to 64%. The dominant-half-cycle ratio (Formula presented.) ≈ 0.72 emerged as a candidate brittle-damage signature for collapse-level response. A Lam–Teng confinement check confirms that the failure migrates from the column ends to debonding fracture in the wrapped panel rather than being eliminated by the retrofit. Supplementary joint-corner anchorage is recommended for non-ductile joints at collapse demand.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 2369 |
| Journal | Buildings |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2026 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2026 by the authors.
Keywords
- CFRP jacketing
- code-versus-observed assessment
- hysteretic decomposition
- non-ductile RC frames
- Park–Ang damage index
- seismic retrofit
- shake-table testing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Damage and Capacity Diagnostics of CFRP-Jacketed Non-Ductile RC Frames'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver