Contacts and cracks of complex shapes: Crack-contact dualities and relations between normal and shear compliances

Ahmet Kiris, Mark Kachanov*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We discuss contacts and cracks of complex shapes, and focus on the following issues:Crack-contact duality - the correspondence between compliances of contacts and cracks of the same shape. For a broad class of shapes (all convex and some concave ones) the correspondence involves shape factor M ≡ π〈a〉〈a-1-1/A where a(φ) is the distance from the centroid to boundary points and A is the area. It is controlled mostly by the extent of shape elongation.Relations between the normal and shear compliances of cracks and contacts. The two are relatively close, and this has implications for the anisotropy due to multiple cracks or contacting rough surfaces. It also allows extension of the elasticity-conductivity connections to the shear compliances;For the overlapping shapes with known solutions for each of the component shapes, a simple "summation rule" is suggested.Comparison of two approximate methods of finding compliances of non-elliptical domains - of Fabrikant and of Boyer-Greenwood.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-255
Number of pages23
JournalInternational Journal of Engineering Science
Volume50
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2012

Funding

The first author (AK) has been supported by The Scientific and Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) to conduct this research under TÜBİTAK-2219 international scholarship program. The support is gratefully acknowledged.

FundersFunder number
Scientific and Research Council of TurkeyTÜBİTAK-2219

    Keywords

    • Compliance
    • Contact
    • Correspondence
    • Crack
    • Shape

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Contacts and cracks of complex shapes: Crack-contact dualities and relations between normal and shear compliances'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this