Abstract
Due to financing limitations, city governments increasingly rely upon private sector finance to support the supply of social and technical infrastructure. Accordingly, developer obligations have become increasingly important in urban planning and in land and property development. Compared to the numbers of previous studies related to ‘non-negotiable developer obligations’ (N-NDOs), the studies related to ‘negotiable developer obligations’ (NDOs) are much more limited. Also, there is a lack of studies comparing their respective impacts. The aim of this article is to compare the impacts of N-NDOs and NDOs within the specific country context of Turkey. The findings of study demonstrate that efficiency of N-NDOs and NDOs is closely related to the balance between certainty and flexibility in planning and land development system, the degree of transparency and the level of accountability, and value capture capacity.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 122-130 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Habitat International |
| Volume | 75 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018 Elsevier Ltd
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Developer obligations
- Land development
- Plan notes
- Turkey
- Urban planning
- Voluntary method
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of the impacts of non-negotiable and negotiable developer obligations in Turkey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver