Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

Ayse Nur Esen*, Sevilay Haciyakupoglu, Sema Erenturk

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Proficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k0-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k0-INAA results.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)677-683
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry
Volume315
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2018

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

Acknowledgements The authors are thankful to International Atomic Energy Agency for their support under regional TC RER 1/007 project and to Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) that supported the Joint Research and Development Project (TUBITAK Project No: 212T190) on k0-INAA studies at ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor.

FundersFunder number
Joint Research and Development Project212T190
TUBITAK
International Technological University
Akademie Věd České Republiky
Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştirma Kurumu
International Atomic Energy AgencyTC RER 1/007

    Keywords

    • INAA
    • Plant
    • Proficiency testing
    • Soil
    • TRIGA
    • WEPAL

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this