Comparison of global geopotential models from the champ and grace missions for regional geoid modelling in Turkey

Bihter Erol*, Michael G. Sideris, Rahmi N. Çelik

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The continuous efforts on establishment and modernization of the geodetic control in Turkey include a number of regional geoid models that have been determined since 1976. The recently released gravimetric Geoid of Turkey, TG03, is used in geodetic applications where GPS-heights need to be converted to the local vertical datum. To reach a regional geoid model with improved accuracy, the selection of the appropriate global geopotential model is of primary importance. This study assesses the performance of a number of recent satellite-only and combined global geopotential models (GGMs) derived from CHAMP and GRACE missions' data in comparison to the older EGM96 model, which is the underlying reference model for TG03. In this respect, gravity anomalies and geoid heights from the global geopotential models were compared with terrestrial gravity data and low-pass filtered GPS/levelling data, respectively. Also, five new gravimetric geoid models, computed by the Fast Fourier Transform technique using terrestrial gravity data and the geopotential models, were validated at the GPS/levelling benchmarks. The findings were also compared with the validation results of the TG03 model. The tests showed that as it was expected any of the high-degree combined models (EIGEN-CG03C, EIGEN-GL04C, EGM96) can be employed for determining the gravity anomalies over Turkey. In the west of Turkey, EGM96 and EIGEN-CHAMP03S fit the GPS/levelling surface better. However, all the tested GGMs revealed equal performance when they were employed in gravimetric geoid modelling after de-trending the gravimetric geoid model with corrector surface fitting. The new geoid models have improved accuracy (after fit) compared to TG03.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-441
Number of pages23
JournalStudia Geophysica et Geodaetica
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2009

Keywords

  • CHAMP
  • Filtering
  • Global Geopotential Models
  • GPS/levelling
  • GRACE
  • Gravity anomalies
  • Remove-Compute-Restore method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of global geopotential models from the champ and grace missions for regional geoid modelling in Turkey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this