Comparison of conventional and differential evolution-based parameter estimation methods on the flood frequency analysis

Muhammet Yilmaz*, Fatih Tosunoglu, Mehmet Cüneyd Demirel

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Accurate estimation of flood frequency is an important task for water resources management. This starts with appropriate selection of probability distribution to flood samples (annual maximum flows) that is of great importance for flood frequency analysis (FFA). In order to reach the most precise estimation, the probability distribution of the considered time series should be well defined and its parameters should be more accurately estimated. First time in the FFA literature, a differential evolution-based parameter estimation method is applied to obtain the parameters of probability distribution functions and is compared with the traditional maximum likelihood method (MLM) in the present study. For this purpose, eleven distributions have been used to describe the annual maximum flood series of nine gauging sites, with the performance of each distribution being investigated based on six criteria. The results revealed that a single distribution cannot be specified as the best-fit distribution for the study area. Moreover, it has been found that the applied approach improves the probability prediction of floods better than MLM method for efficient design of hydraulic structures, risk analysis and floodplain management.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1887-1900
Number of pages14
JournalActa Geophysica
Volume69
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, Institute of Geophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences & Polish Academy of Sciences.

Funding

We sincerely thank the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Turkey, for providing the streamflow data used in the study. DEoptim code is available at https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/DEoptim/ . The third author (MCD) is supported by the National Center for High Performance Computing of Turkey (UHeM) under grant number 1007292019.

FundersFunder number
National Center for High Performance Computing of Turkey
Ulusal Yüksek Başarımlı Hesaplama Merkezi, Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi1007292019

    Keywords

    • Differential evolution method
    • Eastern Black Sea Basin
    • Flood frequency analysis
    • Maximum likelihood method

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of conventional and differential evolution-based parameter estimation methods on the flood frequency analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this