Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem

Tuncay Özcan*, Numan Elebi, Akir Esnaf

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

262 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For the solution of decision making problems with multi criteria, the literature presents many methodologies under the title of decision theory. In this context, AHP, TOPSIS, ELECTRE and Grey Theory are well-known and the most acceptable methodologies. Firstly, in this study; these methodologies are compared in terms of main characteristic of decision theory and thus advantages and disadvantages of these methodologies are offered. Later, the application of these methodologies on the warehouse selection problem, which is one of the main topics of logistics management that has a wide range of applications with multi-criteria decision making methodologies, is presented as a case study which is characterized in retail sector, that maintains high uncertainity and product variety and then how to choose the best warehouse location among many alternatives has been shown.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)9773-9779
Number of pages7
JournalExpert Systems with Applications
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ELECTRE
  • Grey Theory
  • Multi criteria decision making
  • TOPSIS
  • Warehouse location selection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision making methodologies and implementation of a warehouse location selection problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this