Abstract
Şen (2012) proposed the innovative trend analysis methodology and gave its fundamentals in a simple way based on logical deductions. Later, this methodology has been applied by many writers to different data as mentioned by Kisi and Ay (2014) and Kisi (2015), who also implemented the same methodology. In one of illustrations in their paper (Kisi and Ay, 2014) there are incorrectly scattered data and this comment includes the correction for the illustration. Additionally, Kisi's (2015) application of innovative trend method, as explained in detail by Şen (2012, 2014, 2015), has invalid confidence limits (bands) and the invalidation is explained in the comment.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 878-882 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | Journal of Hydrology |
| Volume | 538 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2016 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2016 Elsevier B.V.
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 6 Clean Water and Sanitation
Keywords
- 1:1 (45°) straight-line
- Innovative-Şen method
- Trend
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on “Comparison of Mann–Kendall and innovative trend method for water quality parameters of the Kizilirmak River, Turkey (Kisi and Ay, 2014)” and “An innovative method for trend analysis of monthly pan evaporations (Kisi, 2015)”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver