Comments on 'A comparative study of ANN and neuro-fuzzy for the prediction of dynamic constant of rockmass' by T N Singh, R Kanchan, A K Verma and K Saigal

Tarkan Erdik*, Zekai Şen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Singh et al (2005) examined the potential of the ANN and neuro-fuzzy systems application for the prediction of dynamic constant of rockmass. However, the model proposed by them has some drawbacks according to fuzzy logic principles. This discussion will focus on the main fuzzy logic principles which authors and potential readers should take into consideration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)973-974
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Earth System Science
Volume117
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Keywords

  • Artificial neural network
  • Compressive strength
  • Density
  • Hardness
  • Neuro-fuzzy
  • P-wave velocity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on 'A comparative study of ANN and neuro-fuzzy for the prediction of dynamic constant of rockmass' by T N Singh, R Kanchan, A K Verma and K Saigal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this