Abstract
Combustion reactivity of biomass (Robinia Pseudoacacia) was compared with lignite’s reactivity using various parameters (group A) based on thermal analysis data including ignition temperature (Ti), burning rate (dw/dt), burnout temperature (Tb), heat-flow (H), weights/temperatures/times, etc., and some calculated parameters (Group B) such as conversions or indices of reactivity/combustion performance [mean combustion reactivity (Rm), time-based reactivity (Rt), reactivity normalized to initial sample weight (Rw), ignition index (Di), comprehensive combustion index (S), burnout performance index (Db), combustion index (Hf), and combustion stability indices (Dcs, Dw)]. Although the conversion yields as well as Rt or Rw pointed out that biomass was more reactive than lignite, some reactivity parameters such as the Ti, temperature/time at 5% conversion, the temperature of maximum heat flow implied that lignite’s reactivity was higher probably due to catalytic effects of minerals. Therefore, a comparison of reactivity considering only the Group A parameters especially for low temperatures can lead to misconception.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 370-383 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization and Environmental Effects |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Funding
The authors would like to thank Istanbul Technical University (ITU) for financial support within the Scientific Research Project (MYL-2018-41504).
| Funders | Funder number |
|---|---|
| Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi | MYL-2018-41504 |
Keywords
- biomass
- Combustionreactivity
- lignite
- thermogravimetry