Combined effect of erythromycin, tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole on performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors

Sevcan Aydin*, Bahar Ince, Zeynep Cetecioglu, Osman Arikan, E. Gozde Ozbayram, Aiyoub Shahi, Orhan Ince

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The combined effects of erythromycin-tetracycline-sulfamethoxazole (ETS) and sulfamethoxazole-tetracycline (ST) antibiotics on the performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors were studied. A control reactor was fed with wastewater that was free of antibiotics, while two additional reactors were fed with ETS and ST. The way in which the ETS and ST mixtures impact COD removal, VFA production, antibiotic degradation, biogas production and composition were investigated. The effects of the ETS mixtures were different from the ST mixtures, erythromycin can have an antagonistic effect on sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. The anaerobic pre-treatment of these antibiotics can represent a suitable alternative to the use of chemical treatments for concentrations at 10. mg/L of S and 1. mg/L of T; 2. mg/L of E, 2. mg/L of T and 20. mg/L of S for the ST and ETS reactors respectively, which corresponds to min 70% COD removal efficiency.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)207-214
Number of pages8
JournalBioresource Technology
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2015

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Ltd.

Funding

Authors thank TUBITAK (Turkish Association of Science and Technology) for support of this project (No: 110Y310).

FundersFunder number
TUBITAK
Turkish Association of Science and Technology110Y310

    Keywords

    • Anaerobic treatment
    • Combined effect
    • Erythromycin
    • Sulfamethoxazole
    • Tetracycline

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Combined effect of erythromycin, tetracycline and sulfamethoxazole on performance of anaerobic sequencing batch reactors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this