TY - GEN
T1 - Bidirectional-resistant ductile end diaphragms for straight steel bridges
AU - Celik, O. C.
AU - Bruneau, M.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Ductile end diaphragms can be used both in retrofit and new design of bridges superstructures to mitigate seismic damage in other substructure and superstructure members. They have been introduced in the latest AASHTO Guide Specifications as a structural system that can be used to resist transverse earthquake effects. Here, the ductile end diaphragm concept developed for straight bridges is expanded to make it able to resist bidirectional earthquake excitations. Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are used as the ductile fuses. Two bidirectionally-acting end diaphragm configurations (EDS-1 and EDS-2) are proposed and analytically investigated to seek the best geometrical layout to maximize the dissipated hysteretic energy. Closed form solutions are presented for practical design purposes. Strength, stiffness, and drift characteristics of the proposed configurations are quantified with an emphasis on hysteretic energy dissipation. Numerical results show that the generic bridge geometry, bidirectional loading, and the loading ratio, have a pronounced effect on the end diaphragm's inelastic behavior. In specific circumstances, each of the diaphragm concepts considered exhibit better seismic response, depending on the aspects of response that are deemed preferable in specific applications.
AB - Ductile end diaphragms can be used both in retrofit and new design of bridges superstructures to mitigate seismic damage in other substructure and superstructure members. They have been introduced in the latest AASHTO Guide Specifications as a structural system that can be used to resist transverse earthquake effects. Here, the ductile end diaphragm concept developed for straight bridges is expanded to make it able to resist bidirectional earthquake excitations. Buckling restrained braces (BRBs) are used as the ductile fuses. Two bidirectionally-acting end diaphragm configurations (EDS-1 and EDS-2) are proposed and analytically investigated to seek the best geometrical layout to maximize the dissipated hysteretic energy. Closed form solutions are presented for practical design purposes. Strength, stiffness, and drift characteristics of the proposed configurations are quantified with an emphasis on hysteretic energy dissipation. Numerical results show that the generic bridge geometry, bidirectional loading, and the loading ratio, have a pronounced effect on the end diaphragm's inelastic behavior. In specific circumstances, each of the diaphragm concepts considered exhibit better seismic response, depending on the aspects of response that are deemed preferable in specific applications.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867171861&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84867171861
SN - 9781617388446
T3 - 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th International Tsunami Symposium
SP - 3322
EP - 3331
BT - 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th International Tsunami Symposium
T2 - 9th US National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2010, Including Papers from the 4th International Tsunami Symposium
Y2 - 25 July 2010 through 29 July 2010
ER -