Abstract
We observe that exercises involving abstract representation of 2-D and 3-D shapes are considered by architectural educators to be an important part of early design education. Although the results have been mixed, at best, this conviction persists. The Architectural Scholastic Aptitude Test (ASAT) administered by Educational Testing Services, in the 1960s is one such well known effort that since has been abandoned. Yet the practice of using abstract design problems focusing on the kind of spatial reasoning included in the ASAT is present in the core repertoire of many introductory design studio problems. As we reported in a paper published in 1999, in architecture programmes all over the USA, freshmen still compose with basic geometric shapes in order to learn general design principles. Upperclassmen explore the virtues of the 3 × 3 × 3 grid space. Design researchers toil over the process of recognising emergent patterns based on primary shapes. Our findings in this paper indicate that the decline in skill to manipulate abstract shapes by upperclassmen is due to lack of practice or rehearsal; and this skill does not appear to be central to the learning of students of architecture.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 339-359 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Design Research |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- Aptitude test
- Cube arrangements
- Domain independent skills
- Errors
- Memory rehearsal
- Representation
- Skill retardation
- Spatial manipulation
- Spatial reasoning
- Strategic reasoning