Abstract
We investigated rupture geometry, size, and slip distribution of October 30, 2020, Samos (Sisam)–Kuşadası earthquake combining seismographs, GPS measurements, and SAR analysis. Right after the earthquake, we measured 13 additional campaign-based GPS sites to intensify the available GPS network consisting of 10 continuous stations. We combined all available seismographs to have the best possible accuracy for mainshock and aftershock hypocenter locations. We compiled all available seismic profiles and integrated them using high-resolution bathymetry to map seismically active faults. The mainshock hypocenter is located at 37.913 ± 0.009 N° and 26.768 ± 0.017 E° and a depth of 12.3 ± 1.7 km. Our fault plane solution shows that the mainshock has almost a pure normal-type mechanism. Based on accurate aftershock locations as well as InSAR results, the mainshock rupture is subsegmented with two north-dipping rupture planes. The rupture probably starts on a low angle plane generating 1.1 m average slip between the depths of 9–14 km. It merges to a steep plane at 9 km depth where it generates 1.2 m average slip extending towards the surface near the shoreline of Samos (Sisam) Island. Total size of the two rupture planes and their average slips determine that the magnitude of the mainshock is (Mw ) 6.92 ± 0.02. The mainshock has substantially increased Coulomb stress on several fault segments near the towns Kuşadası and Söke, which have the potentials to generate strong earthquakes. It also nonnegligibly increased Coulomb stress on several fault segments south of İzmir giving a warning for increased earthquake hazard in this highly inhabited area.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 425-435 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences |
Volume | 30 |
Issue number | 4 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© TÜBİTAK.
Funding
We thank The General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, and The General Directorate of Mapping and also Treecomp Company for GPS data. Turkish Office of Navigation, Hydrography and Oceanography is gratefully acknowledged for providing multibeam bathymetry data. Maps and graphs were generated using the GMT and MATLAB. The study was partially supported by the research project “Slip deficit along Major Seismic Gaps in Turkey”, which has been funded by Boğaziçi University (project number: 18T03SUP4). We thank Margarita Segou for the discussions on stress change modeling. We appreciate constructive comments by Editor Orhan Tatar, reviewer Şerif Barış and the anonymous reviewer. Science Academy Turkey supported the study through Young Scientist Award (BAGEP), which has been given to Fatih Bulut in 2020. We thank The General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre, and The General Directorate of Mapping and also Treecomp Company for GPS data. Turkish Office of Navigation, Hydrography and Oceanography is gratefully acknowledged for providing multibeam bathymetry data. Maps and graphs were generated using the GMT and MATLAB. The study was partially supported by the research project ?Slip deficit along Major Seismic Gaps in Turkey?, which has been funded by Bo?azi?i University (project number: 18T03SUP4). We thank Margarita Segou for the discussions on stress change modeling. We appreciate constructive comments by Editor Orhan Tatar, reviewer ?erif Bar?? and the anonymous reviewer. Science Academy Turkey supported the study through Young Scientist Award (BAGEP), which has been given to Fatih Bulut in 2020.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Bo?azi?i University | |
General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre | |
Boğaziçi Üniversitesi | 18T03SUP4 |
Keywords
- 2020 Samos (sisam)–kuşadası earthquake
- Earthquake hazard
- Earthquake source observations
- GPS
- InSAR
- Seismicity and tectonics