An oblique osteotomy is better for subtrochanteric shortening in total hip arthroplasty for high hip dislocation: a mechanical comparison of four techniques

Dogan Atlihan, Cem Yildirim*, Osman Gorkem Muratoglu, Duran Can Muslu, Mazhar Tokgözoğlu, Dilara Bayir, Ergun Bozdag

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Subtrochanteric femoral shortening is used during total hip arthroplasty for high hip dislocation in developmental dysplasia of hip patients. Methods: We mechanically tested the stability of various commonly used subtrochanteric osteotomy techniques. As the equivalent of a femoral stem placed in a shortened femur without any stable fixation at the osteotomy line, 2 polyvinylchloride pipes were loosely intertwined. 4 different osteotomies (Z-subtrochanteric osteotomy, oblique-45° osteotomy, double Chevron-90° and 120° subtrochanteric osteotomy) were simulated. Torsional and axial loads were applied, and torsional stiffness was calculated for each test model. Results: Z, double Chevron-90° and 120° subtrochanteric osteotomy models demonstrated lower mean torsional stiffness than oblique-45° osteotomy. With the highest torsional stiffness oblique-45° provides the best stability for treatment of high dislocation hips when a subtrochanteric osteotomy is added. Conclusions: This matches our previous clinical experience. Oblique osteotomy may also provide higher contact surfaces in the osteotomy lines to promote bone healing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)345-352
Number of pages8
JournalHIP International
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • biomechanics
  • high hip dislocation
  • osteotomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An oblique osteotomy is better for subtrochanteric shortening in total hip arthroplasty for high hip dislocation: a mechanical comparison of four techniques'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this