Accuracy comparison of interior orientation parameters from different photogrammetric software and direct linear transformation method

Keyphrases

• Accuracy Comparison 100%
• Three Dimensional Model 100%
• Photogrammetric 100%
• Agisoft 100%
• Direct Linear Transformation 100%
• Linear Transformation Model 100%
• Interior Orientation Parameters 100%
• Low Error 50%
• Error Value 50%
• Photogrammetry 50%
• Modeling Process 50%
• Photogrammetric Method 50%
• Aerial Image 50%
• Three-dimensional Flow 50%
• Algorithm Method 50%
• 3D Model 50%
• Accuracy Analysis 50%
• Geodetic Method 50%
• Computer Vision Algorithms 50%
• Orientation Parameters 50%
• Local Coordinate System 50%
• Zephyr 50%
• Background Calibration 50%
• Terrestrial Images 50%
• PhotoModeler 50%
• Image-based 3D Modeling 50%
• Point Analysis 50%
• Matrix Laboratory (MATLAB) 50%
• Mathematical Background 50%

Engineering

• Test Area 100%
• Three-Dimensional Models 100%
• Linear Transformation 100%
• Computervision 50%
• Error Value 50%
• Aerial Image 50%
• Test Network 50%
• Check Point 50%
• Local Coordinate System 50%

Earth and Planetary Sciences

• Computer Vision 100%
• Accuracy Analysis 100%
• Photogrammetric Method 100%
• Photogrammetry 100%