Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A proportional decomposed fuzzy set-based AHP approach for LNG bunkering facility determination in maritime ports

  • Gülşah Şahin*
  • , Emre Akyuz
  • , Selcuk Cebi
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Yildiz Technical University
  • Azerbaijan State University of Economics

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Selecting liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering facilities is a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) challenge involving significant uncertainty. Decomposed Fuzzy Sets (DFS) manage this uncertainty by capturing decision-makers’ cognitive processes through functional and dysfunctional questions. This article introduces proportionality-based models for DFS for the first time. By integrating the reciprocal questioning mechanism of DFS with proportion-based elicitation, the proposed framework captures expert assessments more precisely. A novel proportional decomposed fuzzy AHP method is developed and applied to the LNG bunkering facility selection problem in maritime ports. Findings demonstrate that safety considerations heavily dominate this process; specifically, fire and explosion risk and emergency response accessibility emerge as the most critical sub-criteria. Ultimately, this study confirms the necessity of a risk-oriented, regulation-compliant approach when planning LNG infrastructure in complex port environments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalShips and Offshore Structures
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2026

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Keywords

  • Analytic Hierarchy Process
  • decomposed fuzzy sets
  • LNG bunkering facility
  • maritime decision-making
  • multi-criteria decision-making
  • proportional fuzzy sets

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A proportional decomposed fuzzy set-based AHP approach for LNG bunkering facility determination in maritime ports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this