Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Istanbul Technical University Home
English
Türkçe
Home
Profiles
Research units
Projects
Research output
Prizes
Student theses
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation
Özgür Kabak
*
, Da Ruan
*
Corresponding author for this work
Department of Industrial Engineering
Belgian Nuclear Research Center
Ghent University
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
›
peer-review
31
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison study of fuzzy MADM methods in nuclear safeguards evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Nuclear Safeguards Evaluation
100%
Fuzzy MADM
100%
MADM Methods
100%
Fuzzy multiple Attribute Decision Making (FMADM)
80%
Decision-making Method
40%
Expert Evaluation
40%
Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods
40%
TOPSIS Method
20%
Simple Additive Weighting
20%
Evaluation Challenges
20%
Aggregation Operators
20%
Belief Structure
20%
Linguistic Method
20%
Nuclear Weapons
20%
Nuclear Program
20%
Expert Aggregation
20%
Nuclear Activity
20%
Non-compensatory Method
20%
Computer Science
Comparison Study
100%
multiple attribute decision making
100%
Decision-Making Method
50%
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
25%
Final Decision
25%
Illustration Purpose
25%
Nuclear Weapon
25%
Engineering
Nuclear Safeguard
100%
Attribute Decision
80%
Applicability
20%
Main Issue
20%
Activity (Nuclear)
20%
Nuclear Weapon
20%
Social Sciences
Decision Making
100%
Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution
25%
Nuclear Weapon
25%