A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT FINITE ELEMENT TYPES IN STRAIN-GRADIENT ELASTICITY SIMULATIONS PERFORMED ON FIREDRAKE AND FENICS

B. Cagri Sarar, M. Erden Yildizdag, Francesco Fabbrocino, B. Emek Abali*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The layer-upon-layer approach in additive manufacturing, open or closed cells in polymeric or metallic foams involve an intrinsic microstructure tailored to the underlying applications. Homogenization of such architectured materials creates metamaterials modeled by higher-gradient models, specifically when the microstructure’s characteristic length is comparable to the length scale of the structure. In this study, we conduct a comparative analysis of various finite elements methods for solving problems in strain-gradient elasticity. We employ open-source packages from Firedrake and FEniCS. Different finite element formulations are tested: we implement Lagrange, Argyris, Hermite elements, a Hu–Washizu type (mixed FEM) formulation, as well as isogeometric analysis with non-uniform rational B-splines (NURBS). For the numerical study, we investigate one- and two-dimensional problems discussed in the literature of strain-gradient modeling. Among the examined formulations, Argyris and mixed FEM demonstrate superior accuracy, whereas Hermite and IGA lack of convergence behavior. Displacements predicted by Hermite elements also differ noticeably in the 1-D case. All developed codes are open-access to encourage research in finite element method (FEM) based computation of generalized continua.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)237-252
Number of pages16
JournalMathematics and Mechanics of Complex Systems
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 MSP.

Keywords

  • finite element method
  • higher-gradient modeling
  • strain-gradient elasticity
  • variational method

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS FOR DIFFERENT FINITE ELEMENT TYPES IN STRAIN-GRADIENT ELASTICITY SIMULATIONS PERFORMED ON FIREDRAKE AND FENICS'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this