Örüntülü ortam bilgi-saklama sistemleri i̇çin kanal modellerinin karşilaştirilmasi

Translated title of the contribution: Comparison of channel models for patterned media storage

Arpit Gupta*, Mehmet Keskinoz

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Patterned Media Storage (PMS) is one of the promising technologies to overcome the limitations of the conventional magnetic recording. While advanced signal processing and coding algorithms helps to improve the bit error rate performance of Patterned Media Storage (PMS) channel, they have to be designed by considering the underlying channel model. In literature, there are two popular channel models for PMS: Approximate Model and Analytical Model. In this paper, we first shortly explain these models and then compare their responses by calculating their normalized mean-square error (NMSE) between two models. Through the numerical experiments, we find that NMSE can be substantially high up to 99%. Therefore, we conclude that Approximate Model should not be used to develop signal processing algorithms for PMS.

Translated title of the contributionComparison of channel models for patterned media storage
Original languageTurkish
Title of host publication2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 2009
Pages944-947
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009
Externally publishedYes
Event2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 2009 - Antalya, Turkey
Duration: 9 Apr 200911 Apr 2009

Publication series

Name2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 2009

Conference

Conference2009 IEEE 17th Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference, SIU 2009
Country/TerritoryTurkey
CityAntalya
Period9/04/0911/04/09

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of channel models for patterned media storage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this